Monday, January 11, 2016

Acupuncturists are LIPs and how that affects how to hire and credential them

updated 7.27.2016


keywords:  LIPs, credentialing, privileging, Joint Commission, NPI, CMS

Acupuncturists and LIP status.
Licensed Acupuncturists (L.Ac.) are Licensed Independent Practitioners (LIPs), and recognized as such in 43 states and the District of Columbia.
LIP is a legal term.  It is affected by and related to state licensing law (scope of practice by state).  It is defined by The Joint Commission. 
According to HIPAA (which is about insurance payment and coding streamlining and privacy protection), all LIPs must carry an NPI.   An NPI (national provider identifier) is used to track insurance claims.  When you are filling out employment paperwork at a hospital, you submit them your NPI (among many other forms).
The definition of NPI by CMS (Center for Medicaid/Medicare), “the NPI is a unique identification number for covered health care providers [who, along with all plans or companies who provide health care insurance] must use the NPIs in the administrative and financial transactions adopted under HIPAA.  The NPI is a 10-position, intelligence-free numeric identifier.”  [see related blogpost on NPI.]

Licensed Independent Practitioners (LIPs) and The Joint Commission (TJC)
The Joint Commission (TJC) and LIP.  TJC’s document, The Who, What, When, and Where’s of Credentialing and Privileging discusses the particulars of said process.  Related to L.Ac.s, we look at how they treat LIPs (since we are LIPs).  “An ‘LIP’ is a licensed independent practitioner, defined as an individual, as permitted by law and regulation, and also by the organization, to provide care and services without direction or supervision within the scope of the individual’s license and consistent with the privileges granted by the organization.”

Credentialing as a vetting process for a new hire.
Credentialing, is a vetting process, as a hospital admin colleague of mine explains.  In fact, going back to page 2 of TJC’s Who, What, When, Where document, under “credentialing”:  Credentialing is the process of obtaining, verifying, and assessing the qualifications of a practitioner to provide care or services in or for a health care organization. Credentials are documented evidence of licensure, education, training, experience, or other qualifications. Examples of credentials are a certificate, letter, or experience that qualifies somebody to do something. They can be a letter, badge, or other official identification that confirms somebody’s position or status. Your organization obtains primary source verification of the LIP’s education, training, certificates and licensure from the primary source, and maintains the file of information.


Credentialing of LIPs as medical staff appointments
Medical and dental staff appointments are a traditional in some hospital systems.  All staff appointments are LIPs.  But not all LIPs qualify for medical or dental staff appointment.  Every hospital system that has this tradition of medical staff appointments has related qualification standards.  For example, some centers state only full-time employee LIPs are eligible for staff appointment (not part-time).  Check your local medical facility for what their written medical appointment qualifying standards are.

Review 
Generally, the LIP recognition is what we go for when looking to be hired at an institution.  We are LIPs; start here.  

References

Definitions
L.Ac.--  Licensed Acupuncturist, the most common state license title 
LIP--Licensed Independent Practitioner
HIPAA--Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
NPI--national provider identifier
CMS--Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services  www.cms.gov

TJC--The Joint Commission, an independent non-profit entity that accredits and certifies healthcare facilities and programs; a major quality assurance entity.

For more thorough information on this topic, read my article in Meridians,
Gale M, Hospital Practice:  Recognition of Acupuncturist as a Licensed Independent Practitioner (LIP).  Meridians:  JAOM, 2016 3(4) (accepted for publication).

related blogposts:

Thursday, November 12, 2015

Credentialing and Privileging, part 9: Temporary privileges

keywords:  credentialing, privileging, temporary privileges, telemedicine

So far, what I am understanding from these resources is that temporary privileges are commonly granted in the following cases:
disaster relief scenarios
telemedicine and telehealth consultations
any time medical facility has an "urgent need" to deliver "necessary care" to the patient.


Temporary privileging, more reading: 
Joint Commission reference p. 6
A 2010 article from HC-Pro explains "expedited credentialing" vs. granting temporary privileges.

2015 article on pros and cons of temporary privileges.  Temporary privileges most common in disaster relief conditions and for telemedicine consultation. The author looks at TJC guidelines and CMS interpretation of guidelines and refers you back to your state hospital organization for direction.  


Credentialing and Privileging part 8: Joint Commission references

Joint Commission References on Credentialing and Privileging
original post 2015.11.12, revised 2016.08.29

Keywords:  credentialing, privileging, Joint Commission, licensed independent provider (LIP)


Joint Commission standards on independent providers, credentialing, and privileging:
The Joint Commission (TJC) is the authority on credentialing and privileging guidelines for all U.S. hospital and healthcare systems:   
“An ‘LIP’ is a licensed independent practitioner, defined as an individual, as permitted by law and regulation, and also by the organization, to provide care and services without direction or supervision within the scope of the individual’s license and consistent with the privileges granted by the organization” [TJC’s The Who, What, When, and Where’s of Credentialing and Privileging]


The Joint Commission's Guideline:  Who/What/When/Where of Credentialing 
**great resource**
This resource quoted above, its full title is The Joint Commission Ambulatory Care Program:  The Who, What, When, and Where's of Credentialing and Privileging.  It reviews the basic guidelines for credentialing and privileging health care providers.

Credentialing and Privileging, implementing a process.  Joint Commission blogpost March 12th, 2012, Virginia McCollum, "Credentialing and Privileging-Implementing a process", Ambulatory Buzz.  This blogpost outlines the basics for understanding the credentialing process for an LIP from a TJC leader's perspective.

"Getting to the Heart of Credentialing and Privileging", an April 23rd, 2014, Ambulatory Buzz blogpost written by TJC ambulatory surveyors, Susan Herrold, MN, RN and Mary Pat Hall, MSN, RN, sharing their viewpoint and advice on the process.

More reading:
HH Blogpost that discusses OPPE and FPPE more
Here is a link to the Joint Commission blog
HH blogpost on temporary privileges


Monday, November 9, 2015

Research Journals, literacy, levels to consider when publishing or perusing

Research Journals for publication or perusing
Keywords:  research literacy, publishing, research journals, peer-reviewing research, reading research, research review


Topic:  Acupuncture/EAM and choosing a research journal for publication

author/editor:  Megan Kingsley Gale
Contributing authors/ideas:  Dr. Fuji McPherson, Dr. Chris Kleronomos

So, you've done your research and are finishing up the main part of the work and writing up your results.  Have you starting your list of ideal journals to submit your work to?  

Choosing a journal for publication of your work is a learned skill.  I asked a couple colleagues whom I admire for their research study designs about their advice to other EAMPs looking to publish their work.  
  
The Highest Standard
The highest standard for research journals are those that have or are the following:
1.  Peer-reviewed journals
2.  The journal’s articles/publications are indexed on PubMed/Medline[i].


3.  The journal is well-read or well-known.  And/or journal has a good reputation.

The peer-reviewed journals Science and Nature are the highest level journals to be published in for the above reasons.  The only accept original work.  They do not accept literature reviews.  However, being accepted for publication in either of those two journals is, by virtue of their reputations, challenging due to sheer competition.

Next Level
Next level of journals to publish in.  ie:  not Science or Nature
Still peer-reviewed journals
Still indexed on PubMed/NCBI.
Consider those journals that have widest distribution and are relevant to your fields (subject matter).


Examples:
Pain Practitioner
Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine (ATHM)
Integrative Medicine:  A Clinician’s Journal (IMCJ)
Journal of Nurse Practitioners

Your other area of specialty, some examples:
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
Journal of Nurse Practitioners
Journal of Pain Medicine
American Journal of Public Health
Family and Community Health

For example, if your work is in pediatrics, go to the main journal for pediatrics.  If you work is in sleep, go to the main journals about sleep medicine/insomnia/pulmonology/brain science.

Lowest level of professional journals to publish in:
Peer-reviewed
Not indexed in PubMed, but professional enough that it may one day be indexed.
Has a wide distribution among your peers.


Examples:
Journal of TCM (British, about 20 years of publication)
Military Medicine—publication of AMSUS, the society of federal health care practitioners.  Specific audience.  Wide distribution among that audience.
More advice in choosing a journal to submit your work:
Do a PubMed search under your subject area.  Is your type of work over-published or unique?  If it is unique, you have a greater probability of being published by more variety of journals.  If your work is more of what is already currently very common, you will have more competition in getting published.

Related posts
Meridians






[i] PubMed/NCBI is the online medical research journal search engine.  If a person is researching a topic, he/she would go to PubMed and search there.  If you work is submitted to a journal that is not indexed on PubMed, the researcher (professional or amateur or average clinician) would not find it.



Friday, October 9, 2015

Dual License L.Ac.s and Hospital Practice

10.9.2015 draft
keywords:  credentialing, privileging, hospital sponsor, PCM, KSAs, biomedical training, hospital culture

Related topics:  Hospital Sponsor

Author/Editor:  Megan Kingsley Gale
Contributing authors:  Fujio McPherson, DAOM, ARNP 
If you are a dual-licensee reading this, please chime in on the comments section.  Would love to hear form you!

Dual-licensed L.Ac.s and strength brought to EAM Hospital Work

A dual-licensed L.Ac. brings great strength to his/her work in the hospital.  Because she also has a Western medical health care license (MD, DO, DC, ARNP), she has a foot in both worlds.  She understands hospital culture and can be a wonderful advocate for single-licensed L.Ac.s into hospital setting.  These dual-licensees, in practice have often been the first L.Ac.s into hospitals.  They have been hired under their non-L.Ac. health care license.  Some have slowly incorporated more EAM work into their clinical practice (when hospital culture was right, they added acupuncture and EAM procedures to their “delineation of clinical privileges”).  Some, in the case of some VA/VHA L.Ac.s, were hired under their non-L.Ac. license for the job of an L.Ac.  i.e. an RN-L.Ac. hired to do full-time L.Ac. work, but no current occupational code existed in hospital system for hiring L.Ac., so hired and credentialed under RN licensed, but position description is entirely L.Ac., not RN and practice work is all L.Ac.  Same example for PA and DC.

Dual-licensees make great primaries on hospital Integrative Medicine research projects.


Negatives to dual-license L.Ac.s in hospital practice

When push comes to shove, these L.Ac.s often find themselves doing more of the non-L.Ac. healthcare work because that is (area of need) where hospital needs them first.  This is less common with RN-L.Ac.s.  Very common with MD-L.Ac.s and ARNP-L.Ac.s.  Non-dual licensees do not have this pull toward two-jobs-in-one.  An L.Ac.-only can not have his time divided into other health care duties.  So, an L.Ac.-only is time and cost-efficient.  Less education expenses to pay back.  Can be counted on to provide only EAM services (not also injections, PAP smears, surgery, etc) to a dedicated clinic.  Having a dedicated L.Ac. clinic is essential to consistent patient care and outcomes.


Dual-licensee distinctions

PCM-L.Ac. and non-PCM-L.Ac.

PCM-L.Ac.
Non-PCM dual-license L.Ac.
Ex:  MD-L.Ac., ARNP-L.Ac., DO-L.Ac,
These are occasionally PCM, depending on state law:
D.C.-L.Ac, ND-L.Ac, PA-L.Ac.
Definite non-PCM dual-modern medicine licenses that seem to help in L.Ac. hospital practice:
RN-L.Ac.—RNs are not providers
PsyD-L.Ac.—clinical psychologist who is also an L.Ac.
MPH-L.Ac.—one of most common dual-licenses for L.Ac.s.  Master of Science in Public Health is a nice fit for EAM providers.  In hospital setting you are likely to work in admin positions or in positions where you are creating community health programs.  Not always clinical work.
PCMs are clearly providers, based on their non-L.Ac. license (MD, DO).
The non-L.Ac. license seems to help these “duall-ees” understand hospital culture and navigate the system.  Sometimes the non-PCM first license has caused confusion when these duallees want to work clinically as L.Ac.s.  The clinical work of an L.Ac., while not PCM, is provider level 2 work.  If the non-L.Ac. license is not in provider work, it may be counter to duallees first position description to do L.Ac. clinical work.  (example:  RNs do not have acupuncture in their scope of practice.  The RN-L.Ac., to do acupuncture, must be hired under L.Ac. PD to be clearly able to do so.  Trouble arising when their PD does not give credit for their L.Ac. background.
A PCM-L.Ac. is usually hired under the PCM license and gets the L.Ac. scope added/granted as part of his/her clinical privileges, sometimes called "extended privileges"


Recommendation to L.Ac. education leaders—making Dual-licensees more common!!

We know dual-license L.Ac.s are door-openers for our field of EAM in:

Research

More jobs

Federal work

Hospital work

Integrative medicine clinics

Specialty clinics

Inpatient work


So, what can we, as a profession, especially at our education institutions, do to make dual-licensees more common?

The discussion continues in comments section, email list, and in our social media groups.  

If you found this information helpful or interesting, please considering donating to or sponsoring the project and joining the email list.

acronymns
EAM--East Asian Medicine.  I current favor this term over the following to describe our modern practice:  TAM (traditional Asian Medicine), AOM (Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine).  In May 2016, President Obama signed a bill to eliminate the term "oriental" from all federal documents because the term is derogatory.
VA/VHA--veteran's administration or veteran's health administration
IM--integrative medicine
PCM--primary care manager
L.Ac./EAMP--state license titles for Acupuncturists.  "Licensed Acupuncturist (L.Ac.)" and "East Asian Medicine Practitioner (EAMP)".  L.Ac. is the most common state title.
PCMH--patient-centered medical homes




 

Monday, October 5, 2015

Credentialing and Privileging Process part 3, FPPE, OPPE, and Peer Review

Credentialing, Privileging, and Professional Practice Evaluation (FPPE and OPPE)

updated 8.26.2016
Keywords:  credentialing, privileging, FPPE, OPPE, quality assurance, peer review, LIP
Related posts:  Credentialing and Privileging section
For updates in practice and/or a consultation, contact us via the website.

In credentialing and privileging Licensed Independent Practitioners (LIP), The Joint Commission (TJC) established the following quality assurance processes, “Focused Professional Practice Evaluation (FPPE)” and “Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (OPPE)”[i].  FPPE is the process a new hospital hire goes through the first year or so of practice.  This is commonly a more detailed and thorough vetting and review process than OPPE.  After the FPPE is complete and the practitioner is no longer “new”, commonly OPPE is used as a professional review and quality assurance measure. [Note that FPPE is always used for a new hospital hire.  It may also be used again (on an established hire) if a practitioner is flagged as performing substandard care.]  

FPPE and OPPE basic guidelines are set by TJC.  Every hospital has specific institution-specific versions of FPPE and OPPE for any provider that falls into the Licensed Independent Practitioner (LIP) category of provider-type.  These institution-specific guidelines follow TJC standards.  [TJC Standards Search page[ii]]  OPPE may include any of the following, as determined by the institution:  periodic chart review, direct observation, monitoring of diagnostic treatment and techniques, possible discussions with consulting providers, nursing personnel, and administrative personnel[iii]

Peer Record Review (periodic chart review by a peer or peers) is a common practice for quality assurance and falls under the requirements that fulfill both FPPE (new hospital hire) and OPPE (established hospital employee).

If you are interested in commenting on a TJC standard: 
“The Joint Commission provides a Standards Online Submission Form as one of the means of soliciting questions about the standards.”  TJC invites providers to use the form and send them your questions and thoughts about the standards in their “how to comment on a standard” webpage: and directed to the TJC Standards Interpretation Group through the online standards question form.

Remember, when TJC looks at creating a standard, they judge it by the following criteria:

  • Does it have a strong evidence-base?
  • Does it have a strong relationship to patient outcomes/clinical care?
  • Does it support a health care organization’s goal of patient safety and quality of care?
  • Does it have benefits that outweigh the costs?
  • Does it support a health care priority which impacts quality and safety?


References  



[i] In 2004 The Joint Commission (TJC) renamed “Peer Review” as “Focused Review of Practitioner Performance” and since 2007, it has been known as “Focused Professional Practice Evaluation (FPPE)” and “Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (OPPE)”. 
[ii] From Standards page, search keyword “OPPE”.  Under “Hospital and Hospital Clinics” category, then OPPE-Intent.  “The intent of OPPE allows the Hospital/Critical Access Hospital to identify professional practice trends that impact the quality of care and patient safety as it relates to privileges granted to the Licensed Independent Practitioners.”
[iii] From Standards page, keyword “OPPE”.  Under the “Hospital and Hospital Clinics” category, then OPPE-data collection guides
[iv] From Standards page, keyword “FPPE”.  Under the “Hospital and Hospital Clinics” category, note the following links for FPPE:
Components of Design Process
Monitoring Timeline
*Intent*
New Privileges
Pre-defined Process
*4 Required Components*
Peer Review

Links for OPPE:
Low volume practitioners—data use from another organization
Medical/cognitive specialties
*data collection guides*
*Intent*

Pioneer Perspectives--Learning from Hospital Practice EAM Pioneers


Starting Acupuncture and East Asian Medicine (EAM) in a Hospital:  Perspectives from Pioneers


Contributing authors, interviews with subject matter experts (SMEs) aka the pioneers:
related topics:  Community Outreach, Pioneer Perspectives

Pioneer Perspectives is a chapter of the Hospital Handbook project that
interviews pioneers in hospital practice East Asian Medicine/Acupuncture.

Goals:  Highlight a Pioneer and his or her work and contribution to our field
How does that work tie in to hospital practice?
How and why is this important and relevant to the current hospital EAM/Acupuncturist practitioner?
What wisdom would this this Pioneer share?

Topics will likely include (not an exhaustive list):
starting up a clinic, SOPs, etc
internships, externships
Research 
Patient Centered Outcomes
Creating an EHR to capture data from EAM provider notes